Judge Thomas’ Masterpiece
Viva Frei’s David Freiheit takes a crack at deciphering the Supreme Court’s decision to deny the petition for certiorari in the Pennsylvania election fraud lawsuit. Simply put, the question of law in this case is whether the Pennsylvania Legislature’s action to modify certain election rules was lawful. In a searing, 10-page dissenting masterpiece, Justice Clarence Thomas admonished his colleagues.
SCOTUS voted 6-3 to deny the petition, explaining there were too few votes to make a difference in the outcome of the election. Thomas argued in his dissent that is a scenario that could be repeated in future elections and the court’s refusal to take the case is inexplicable. Here’s more with Viva Frei.