Jack Smith: Illegal Appointment
Trump’s defense filed their brief opposing Jack Smith’s petition in the Supreme Court, arguing the appeals process should proceed in the ordinary course through the Court of Appeals. Still racing against the clock, Jack Smith’s prosecutors replied, urging the Court to hear the case and return the case to the trial track before the election in November.
Former Reagan Attorney General Edwin Meese submits a brief to the Supreme Court, arguing Jack Smith was illegally appointed as “Special Counsel” and the prosecution against Trump is invalid. Citing the Appointments Clause, Meese argues that Garland overstepped his authority and the entire Special Counsel’s office should be considered disqualified.
Trump objects to Jack Smith’s request to use a jury questionnaire in the Florida classified documents case, arguing the case is nowhere near ready for jury selection. Trump’s defense asks Judge Aileen Cannon to order Jack Smith to stick to the previously ordered schedule and to stop wasting the Court’s resources. Here’s more from Robert Gouveia on Watching The Watchers.
Trump makes it clear that Special Counsel Jack Smith’s desperate attempts to circumvent the appeals process should not stand…Here’s more from RedPill78.
