President Donald Trump is appealing the maze of verdicts handed down by obstructionist leftist judges. Most of these federal judges were appointees of Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
Some already are being proven to have relatives — say, daughters or sons — working in federal agencies that Trump is seeking to trim or streamline. So the stench of corruption overhangs this dubious process.
How do we corral these judges? Can they be impeached? Are their less difficult ways to remove them the process?
How will Trump fight them? What can the U.S. Congress do to help him out? Here’s more from Robert Gouveia.
The Trump Department Of Justice Responds to Judicial Attacks on Executive Orders (THIS IS ILLEGAL!!)
Tulsi Gabbard moves closer to winning appointment to Director of National Intelligence (Will WE SEE REFORMS?)
Here’s more from Robert Gouveia.
Is the Left taking the bait? While many in the legacy media continues to berate Elon Musk for his role in defunding bloated federal programs and agencies, Donald Trump remains largely unscathed. Is this part of a larger strategy by President Trump, asks Victor Davis Hanson on today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words”?
“He’s more legitimate—or he has more statutory legitimacy—than earlier presidential advisors, like Harry Hopkins, who moved into the White House under the FDR administration, or Bernard Baruch, who basically ran two world wars, in terms of domestic production, under Woodrow Wilson and FDR. So, let’s just dispel the idea that he’s doing anything unusual.”
“As far as the executive orders that created the DOGE program and eliminated USAID—that was perfectly legal in itself—USAID was created by John F. Kennedy in 1961, by an executive order. There was a statutory direction for the president to disperse foreign aides into a comprehensive body, but it didn’t say USAID—he could do whatever he wanted. And so, Donald Trump has decided to end autonomous USAID and fold it into the State Department for disaster relief or poverty relief or famine relief.”
“All Donald Trump is doing is saying, ‘I don’t believe the impoundment act is legal. We’ll see what the Supreme Court—but I’m just following the precedent that Joe Biden did.’ But now the shoe’s on the other foot.” Here’s more from The Daily Signal.
Former White House counsel Norm Eisen assails the Trump administration’s attempts to dismantle some programs and agencies. Appearing on “CUOMO,” he says neither the president nor his emissaries have that kind of unilateral power.
Eisen, who originally worked as deputy counsel for Barack Obama, more recently served as an appointed consultant for the House Judiciary Committee spearheading the first House impeachment charges against President Donald Trump. He is behind the “lawfare” tactics that Democrats have used to subvert the will of the majority of Americans.
Their goal is to try to prevent the exposure of gross corruption, fraud and waste, as well as to stall the release of more damaging details about Jeffrey Epstein’s vile Caribbean resort as well as the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
In short, if you hear his name, you should be sure to spit on the ground. Do not believe a single word this political hack says. Do not follow his advice. Let the Democrats keep listening to him because it will surely lead them down a path from which they will never recover. Here’s more from the Chris Cuomo show “Cuomo” on News Nation.
This past Saturday, at 1AM, in the DEAD OF NIGHT, a Federal Judge by the name of Paul Engelmayer, a judge from the U.S. District Court of southern New York, issued a temporary restraining order preventing anyone from auditing the Treasury Department database—including the Treasury Secretary himself!
We are all too familiar with the Progressive Left making political use of friendly Federal judges to hand out nationwide injunctions when they lack the legislative power to assert their will. It seems there’s always a helpful Hawai’ian judge when the Progressive Left needs one.
The question is, what to do about these unelected judges with supposedly lifetime appointments who seem determined to act as though they possess greater Executive Branch authority than does the elected President. Impeachment is always an option, but it’s a heavy burden—requiring a full two-thirds of the Senate.
That super-majority is a stretch under the most egregious of circumstances, and highly unlikely today. There is, however, an easier way to remove an overreaching judge from the bench. Here’s more from Andrew Branca on The Law of Self-Defense.
