Call Me Stormy

Finding righteous currents in turbulent times

Archive for the tag “Jay Sekulow”

Massive Wake-Up Call

The Supreme Court decision in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case was the linchpin that overturned Roe v. Wade.

The ACLJ’s Jay and Jordan Sekulow provide legal analysis of the arguments made and the continued battle for life ahead. The Sekulows and the rest of the ACLJ crew also discuss the historic decision and the launch of a 50-state campaign to defend babies and defeat abortion.

What’s Next In Post-Roe Era?

Jay and Jordan Sekulow, hosts of the American Center for Law and Justice, and the rest of their legal team, break down the historic Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and opine on what happens next in the fight for life in the post-Roe era.

Will SCOTUS Gut Roe v. Wade?

When the Supreme Court decides the fate of Roe v. Wade this summer, will their decision call for a complete reversal of the law, or will it be watered down to where there’s little restriction on abortions. ACLJ’s Jordan Sekulow, Jay Sekulow and senior counsel Frank Manion dig into the details and tell us what’s coming next.

Democrats Seal Their Fate

The Build Back Better bill passed the House of Representatives on Friday, but faces a major uphill battle in the Senate.

Host Jordan Sekulow and the Official ACLJ crew dissect the monstrosity that the Congressional Budget Office says will add $4-5 trillion to the national debt, sealing the Democrat Party’s fate. Here’s their discussion.

IRS Overreach

Harry Hutchison, senior counsel and director of policy for the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) says the left’s proposal regarding the IRS would lead to extreme overreach affecting the majority of Americans.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the IRS is proposing a $10,000 price-target tax dragnet on American bank accounts to trigger more audits, a move that doesn’t sit well with Hutchison and the ACLJ. “The Democrats want access to data with no probable cause, no warrant, no court order,” Hutchison says. “Basically, they say that every single thing that you do as an American citizen on a given day is subject to their approval.” He explains further.

Texas Judge Overrules Supremes

U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman, a liberal Obama appointee, overruled the Supreme Court regarding the Texas Heartbeat Act. Pitman’s ruling effectively struck down the “heartbeat bill,” passed by the Texas Legislature, which bans abortions once a heartbeat is detected, usually around six weeks.

The Supreme Court earlier refused to block the ban, sending Planned Parenthood to Pitman’s court. Says American Center for Law and Justice senior counsel CeCe Heil, “In this law, basically Texas stated that once a heartbeat is detected, it is unlawful for a doctor to perform an abortion. So, the catch is, it is not the state that is going to enforce it. It is going to be an individual that enforces it. That is what has caused the problem. There is really no one to enjoin.” Here’s more analysis on the decision from host Jay Sekulow and the ACLJ crew.

Roe v. Wade Reversal On Track

There has not been a case on track to reverse Roe v. Wade quite like Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization in Mississippi. The challenge arose after Mississippi law banned abortion after 15 weeks.

In response, the state of Mississippi asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade and allow for individual states to ban abortion after the judicially created viability point that has been cited in the past. One of the prominent reasons Roe v. Wade has been able to remain law for decades is a legal precedent called stare decisis. ACLJ Senior Counsel Andy Ekonomou says, “It is not a bar. It is a judicially created principle that espouses the idea that cases decided the same way should be decided the same way on the same facts of law. But it does not prohibit the Supreme Court or any court to say we got it wrong, and we need to rectify by reversing Roe v. Wade in this case.” More on the historic case from “Sekulow” on the ACLJ blog.

Packing The Supreme Court

Holding true to Democrat Party threats to disrupt the justice system in the United States, Team Biden launched a commission to study packing the Supreme Court. This in light of President’s Trump’s unprecedented three appointees to the nation’s highest court, which pushed the conservative majority to 6-3.

The corrupt Democrats, unwilling to play by the rules and adhere to the Constitution, will more than likely “pack” SCOTUS by increasing the bench from nine members to as many as an outrageous 15 to ensure a liberal majority for many years to come.

The party of deceit has already started assembling the commission, beginning with chairman  Bob Bauer, who previously served as Biden’s campaign attorney and who served in the Obama Administration. Bauer, an uber Leftist, has admitted he only works for Democrats and liberals. And there’s more. He is lobbying for term limits on federal judges, which are lifetime appointments.

Hmm, a partisan chair who only works for his ilk and favors term limits for judges … kind of gives you a clear picture of what this bozo has in mind. In this edition of Sekulow Live, former Trump legal team attorney Jay Sekulow and his son, Jordan, dig into the ramifications of the looney commission.

ARVE error: need id and provider

Post Navigation