Call Me Stormy

Finding righteous currents in turbulent times

Archive for the tag “Supreme Court”

Key To Ending Election Theft

Stew Peters reports that America is running out of political solutions to secure the integrity of our elections. He says our government is now a crime syndicate that is unresponsive to its constituents.

Author and political activist Josh Barnett joins Peters to explain how, according to the Supreme Court, state legislatures still have the power to directly appoint presidential electors. He’s expected to meet with the Arizona Freedom Caucus to detail how this electoral strategy will end Democrat election theft in big cities.




Simon Parkes: Path For Trump

Simon Parkes says Donald J. Trump could be back in the White House sooner, rather than later, if Joe Biden’s classified-document scandal continues to escalate.

Parkes believes that Biden will not be charged for storing docs in his Delaware garage, next to the 1960 Corvette, because they are in his private residence. For the same reason, Trump will be exonerated from the docs found at his Mar-a-Lago, Florida, residence, because the President of the United States has special dispensation regarding documents.

“However, the documents found in the Penn office, which relate to when Biden was vice-president, that’s different, because the vice-president comes under federal law, not presidential rule,” Parkes says. He posits that Biden will more than likely get impeached by the now GOP-controlled House and probably resign. He says there’s a strong possibility that VP Kamala Harris and Speaker Kevin McCarthy will decline to assume the presidency, paving the way for a military presence, a full election in March and the return of Trump.

Parkes explains further, plus gives his take on the Brunson v. Alma case.




Juan O. Savin: Shifting Tide

The Supreme Court’s decision to deny the Brunson v. Alma case a judicial review was a bummer for many patriots, but the march toward justice is not over, says Juan O. Savin.

Savin emphasized that he opined on many alternative channel interviews that the likelihood of SCOTUS hearing the case was very low, but says that doesn’t mean it’s zero. “There’s more to come on that, on several fronts,” Savin says. “We’re not done by a longshot. There is up to five appeals and we have another case that’s in the wings, also.” He explains further, plus brings more intel.




SCOTUS Rejects Brunson Case

The U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari (judicial review of lower court decision) to the Brunson v. Alma case, regarding alleged Constitutional irregularities by Congress in certifying the 2020 presidential election. The case named the members of Congress who failed to vote against the 10-day audit of the 2020 presidential election as defendants.

Kek-Check News reports the ruling means the lower court’s ruling that the Brunson case did not have standing (cause to stand before the court) and that sovereign immunity does protect Congressional members and the president was affirmed in an unannounced order by SCOTUS. He says there is a similar case pending in the lower courts, but will more than likely face the same roadblock. Here’s more.




Brunson Case Decision Today

What’s next for the Brunson case at the Supreme Court? GHard_Joe says that after meeting on Jan. 6 and combing through 419 cases–including the Brunson case–that filed for writ of certiorari (judicial review of a lower court decision), SCOTUS will reveal its decision on which cases it will hear today.

GHard_Joe says the Supremes will review the cases based on whether or not the lower courts made a legal mistake on standing or sovereign immunity. The Brunson case challenges the validity of the 2020 presidential election, arguing Congress failed to honor its Constitutional duty to investigate alleged foreign interference before certifying the results. GHard_Joe explains further.




 

Juan O. Savin: Decision Time

Juan O. Savin tells Unrestricted Truths that the Supreme Court decision on whether to hear the Brunson v. Adams election fraud case is rapidly coming to a head.

Savin says the SCOTUS decision is expected on Friday, Jan. 6. The case revolves around whether Congress violated their Constitutional oath by certifying the 2020 presidential election without first investigating a charge by 154 Congressional members surrounding the validity of the vote in six states, and whether there was foreign interference. He explains further and updates the details.




Title 42 Not The End-All Be-All

Official ACLJ’s Jay Sekulow reports that the Supreme Court’s decision to stay Title 42, the Trump-era immigration policy keeping undocumented migrants from entering the United States due to Covid, stopped the Biden Administration’s hanky-panky dead in its tracks. But the order, and Title 42 itself, is not the end-all be-all on immigration and dealing with our border crisis.

Sekulow says the decision merely kicks the can down the road a little farther, so to speak. He brings a comprehensive analysis of the order, including a thorough discussion with ACLJ Senior Advisor for National Security and Foreign Policy Ric Grenell.




Juan O. Savin: CIA Our Enemy

An animated Juan O. Savin tells David “Nino” Rodriguez that the intelligence community has been weaponized against the American people. “That’s what Eisenhower told you: Beware of the Military Industrial Complex,” he says.

Savin touches on Tucker Carlson’s recent report of the CIA’s alleged involvement in the assassination of President Kennedy, calling it a “coup against America.” He also says the American Southwest is now a captured operation, under the thumbs of the unions and Mexican cartels, updates the Brunson election fraud case and reveals the revelation that Dominion Voting Systems was recently purchased by UBS, a northern European entity financed by the Chinese!




Juan O. Savin: Trump Card

The drama surrounding the 2020 presidential election fraud will take its first step toward resolution on Jan. 6, when the Supreme Court decides whether to hear the Brunson v. Alma S. Adams case.

Juan O. Savin tells David “Nino” Rodriguez the Brunson case sues members of Congress for voting against the proposed 10-day audit of the 2020 elections and then certifying the results. If the court accepts the case and a positive verdict is later directed, this could lead either lead to a re-vote or immediate reinstatement of President Trump.

Savin says that unlike the lower courts and some of the higher courts, where justices are bought and paid for, you now have a Supreme Court that has proven they can go against the grain and judge according to what the Constitution stipulates. Could we be experiencing the initiation of the Trump Card? He explains further and drops more intel.




Election Case Freaks Out Left

Truth And Art TV’s Bernie Suarez reports that the left is already freaking out over a crucial election case that has reached the Supreme Court.

Suarez says oral arguments are under way in Moore vs. Harper, a North Carolina case about who has the power to write election laws, a precedent that will have huge consequences in many areas, such as adopting voter ID to redistricting.  Suarez explains further (beginning at :44:50), plus discusses the announcement that the DOJ  is now investigating FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried and how the CDC used a backchannel with Twitter to control the Covid-19 narrative and more




Post Navigation