Call Me Stormy

Finding righteous currents in turbulent times

Archive for the tag “Trump’s legal team”

Plenty For Trump To Appeal

ACLJ Executive Director Jordan Sekulow tells TBN’s Mike Huckabee that there’s plenty for President Trump to appeal following his conviction in the New York hush-money trial.

Sekulow, one of the few who accurately predicted the outcome of the trial, says it may be difficult maneuvering through the New York Appellate system, but says the process will ultimately get him to the U.S. Supreme Court. He says the Supremes should have a heyday with the case, reviewing Judge Juan Merchan’s weird jury instructions and his decision to disallow the testimony of the former chairman of the Federal Election Commission.

Sekulow says perhaps the most egregious error was that Trump’s legal team was not allowed to fight the felony charge brought against him. He explains further, plus gives his analysis of the additional cases that Trump faces.

Juan O. Savin: Judicial Fraud

Juan O. Savin tells MamaHubs.com that we are currently witnessing a judicial system that’s out of control and no longer following any normative rules or instruction.

Savin says the bizarre antics of corrupt Judge Juan Merchan and disillusioned Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg in the Trump hush money trial was an attack on all of America. “This is a civil rights violation, because this court and this prosecutor are damaging our ability as Americans to have a national campaign with someone who the people want to get a chance to vote for.”

While the Trump legal team will proceed with an immediate appeal of the guilty verdict, Savin says there is more than one case in their arsenal regarding election interference. Savin says the Trennis Evans Colorado ballot-fraud case has the best chance of reaching the Supreme Court.

Savin details the particulars, plus delves into the profound Bible narrative of the Book of Esther, drawing powerful parallels to our current times and emphasizing the divine guidance present in our lives.

Military Can Fix Election Results

Sidney Powell, former advisor to the Trump legal team, dropped a bomb on Tuesday, confirming that for at least the last 20 years, somebody other than the voters of the United States has been determining the outcome of certain elections, which last cycle included the presidency.

“This is nothing other than a coup,” she says, and the Department of Defense knows damn well about it also, because they patented a process for real-time monitoring of the elections and were doing exactly the same things in 2005. And they also have a patent for the predetermination of election results.”

Shockingly, Powell says, most of the entrenched politicians on both sides of the aisle have known of this problem for a longtime and have more than likely participated in the benefits of the fraud. Here’s more with Powell on “The Stew Peters Show.”

Will Justice Barrett Abstain?

As time runs out before the states’ electors are seated, a momentous Supreme Court decision could come down in literally minutes, regarding voter fraud in the general election. There is still ongoing litigation in Georgia and Wisconsin and those states are considered outcome determinative. And if and when the case reaches SCOTUS, all eyes will be on Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the newest member of the Supremes.

During a discussion on Jay Sekulow Live, hosted by Team Trump legal attorney Jay Sekulow, a phone caller into the program basically asked if Justice Barrett would abstain from voting on the historic case, or outright recuse herself. Sekulow, who also represented Trump in the impeachment hearings, was quick to respond. “She does not have to abstain. Each justice makes that own decision. She did not say she was going to abstain and regardless of the outcome of this election, she’s on for life.”

The panel went on to emphasize that Barrett was never involved in any case in this election cycle, anyway. So for her to abstain wouldn’t make any sense.

ARVE error: need id and provider

FBI Nowhere To Be Found

Dozens of witnesses packed court rooms at five different election-fraud hearings in four states in the last week to testify about allegations ranging from bogus and back-dated ballots to tabulation errors and voter intimidation.

The most explosive of the lot continues to be Suitcase-gate in Georgia, where there is bombshell evidence of a tape recording at an election center that was locked down and everyone chased out with the exception of five poll workers. They proceeded to pull several suitcases  chock-full of phony ballots–about 80,000–and scanned them several times. Team Trump head legal attorney Rudy Giuliani says the crew stayed up all night scanning ballots that resulted in a 148,00 to 7,000 advantage for Joe Biden.

One would think the shenanigans could easily be solved by hauling in the poll workers for questioning by the FBI. Not the case, says Giuliani. “Those people were also involved in taking USBs, taking information out of machines. They have a little history. The FBI is nowhere to be found.”

Giuliani spells out the chaos for Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo and gives a status report on the lawsuits in the some of the key swing states.

(EDITOR’S NOTE: Fox News deleted this video. In its absence, we give you a Next News Network report on Rudy’s findings vis a vis the FBI and election fraud.)

Judge Gives Trump Huge Win

President Trump is one step closer to four more years in the White House, after a 13th Circuit Court judge authorized the forensic audit of voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan.

Rudy Giuliani, Team Trump’s lead legal attorney, declared the order an enormous victory for the President. The Epoch Times was among the first media agencies breaking the news, reporting that 22 machines and their software components will be reviewed after allegedly malfunctioning and flipping Trump votes over to Joe Biden. “This is a big win for honest elections,” Giuliani told The Times.

As expected, Michigan’s Department of State attributed the miscalculation to a human error in the county clerk’s office. “It’s always a human error that helps Biden. It’s very bizarre,” says investigative journalist and author H.A.. Goodman.  Allegations of vote manipulation through the software machines figured prominently in a number of post-election lawsuits filed by former federal prosecutor and ex-Trump legal team attorney Sidney Powell.

Here’s more analysis of the bombshell decision from Goodman.

ARVE error: need id and provider

Legal Suits May Spark Violence

President Trump’s legal challenge of the 2020 election appears to be hanging on the outcome of the vote in Georgia, Michigan and Pennsylvania, both at the ballot boxes and courts.

Team Trump filed suit in the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, asking for a stay on the vote until ballots filed after election day are tossed. In addition, Team Trump’s suit in Alleghany County, Pa., charges that the Republican Party was blocked from observing the vote. In Michigan, there is a suit in Wayne County, home to the state’s largest city of Detroit, which harbors a long history of voter fraud. The suit, which will be heard in U.S. District Court, alleges the county violated all kinds of laws.

Then there’s Georgia, where an ongoing recount has already uncovered uncounted ballots in two counties. A flip in the results there will surely throw the election into a tailspin. Political commentator Bill O’Reilly says its more than likely that the suits, especially in Pennsylvania, will keep the United States Supreme Court busy in the next few weeks. But one problem lingers, he says. If SCOTUS grants the stay in Pennsylvania, it will trigger street violence like we’ve never seen. “The court knows that and the authorities know that, therefore that is a factor in these rulings,” he says. “Maybe it shouldn’t be, because the Constitution doesn’t say that if there’s going to be violence, you shouldn’t rule the proper way. The law is the law, but it better be pretty darn big.” Here’s more with O’Reilly on The First.

ARVE error: need id and provider

Post Navigation