How are the Democrats seeking to pack the U.S. Supreme Court? Do they have plans to make Puerto Rico and Washington D.C. into new states so they can forever rig and control American elections?
Stephen Gardner unpacks the hard evidence of attempted voter fraud, joined by Eric Eggers. He’s a researcher from The Drill Down podcast, where he works alongside investigative journalist Peter Schweizer, author of Clinton Cash and Secret Empires.
Judge Joe Brown weighs in on the gross abuses of justice perpetrated by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith, spying on at least 10 Republicans Senators during Operation Arctic Frost, including Ted Cruz and Marsha Blackburn. Smith drew his authorization from the corrupt Joe Biden administration, along with members of the January 6th Committee, featuring the treasonous Liz Cheney.
We’ll know America is on the right track if we ever see the despicable Smith or Cheney hung by the neck — in broad daylight — in front of the Washington Monument. But we’re not exactly anticipating we’ll see that anytime soon.
In the meantime, we’ll draw upon Judge Brown’s legal expertise on measures we can take, operating within the bounds of the law, to ferret out traitors and send them packing. Brown formerly had his own reality TV show, based in Shelby County, Tennessee, and airing for 15 years, in syndication. Here’s more from Stephen Gardner.
Paramount Tactical Solutions, one of the nation’s most successful training schools for snipers, will soon post a full, 3-D rendering of the Utah Valley University grounds where Charlie Kirk was assassinated in Orem, Utah. Here, Gary Melton, who heads the training school in West Virginia, talks about the rendering and shows footage he took himself on the campus of UVU earlier this week.
Melton trained as a sniper for the U.S. Army, serving four combat tours of duty working as a Special Forces Weapons Sergeant. His school offers training for hunters, self-defense and survival enthusiasts, but is best known as an elite center for long-range sniper training, drawing students from law enforcement and the military. Melton’s sharp analysis of the Butler, Pennsylvania, sniper attack on President Donald Trump earned him extensive online viewership.
Melton believes it’s important “to hold the government accountable” to know if it’s being transparent or lying to us. He says, “I do think that we’ve seen more transparency on this, compared to Butler we’ve seen a lot more transparency.” So while some have complained that the FBI has withheld too many details, Melton says the agency “has definitely been doing better.”
Stephen Gardner returns to the UVU campus and revisits his original assumptions and conclusions. He’s now coming to believe the shot that took down Charlie Kirk did come from Tyler Robinson — atop the Losee Center. If so, the FBI has arrested the right suspect. He’s also joined by Gary Melton from Paramount Tactical Solutions.
Is it possible Tyler Robinson was a patsy or a decoy. Could a shot have come from another location?
MSNBC reports former National Security Advisor John Bolton could be indicted this coming week. He is charged with keeping classified documents at his home or office, and also possibly transmitting those documents. The FBI raided Bolton’s Maryland home in August. The acting U.S. Attorney in Maryland is reportedly moving quickly to seek criminal charges against Bolton.
In other news, the White House is stepping up its efforts to challenge NGOs and individual donors that fund Antifa and other terrorist outfits. The Democrats and Republicans continue to bicker over funding the federal government. No sogns when the impasse might be settled.
Also, Venezuela is offering trillions of dollars worth of oil, gold and rare minerals to the United States. This comes as tensions have been on the rise between the two nations, including recent instances where American Navy fired upon Venezuelan ships in the Caribbean. Has Nicholas Maduro overstepped bounds with his drug running and election rigging? Here’s more from Stephen Gardner.
Stephen Gardner interviews Lauren the Mortician, an embalmer, on the Sep. 10th assassination of Charlie Kirk in Orem, Utah. Lauren, who has a channel on YouTube, sheds light on the processes used by the medical examiner, morticians and funeral operators to ascertain damage to Kirk’s body and prepare him for burial. She clarifies: An autopsy was done, as it’s required by every state, particularly in cases where murder or foul play is suspected.
X-rays serve as the major tools used to gauge what’s called a “trajectory analysis.” This enables law enforcement authorities to determine the pathway of bullets, measure ballistics and ascertain where the shooter might have fired from. For instance, was the gun fired from the rooftop of a building or from some other point within the crowd?
As a standard practice, this is not information that’s released to the public. If it’s released, it will come from the family or from Turning Point USA, or be brought up as evidence in the criminal trial(s) of those engaged in the shooting — the suspect Tyler Robinson and/or any other known accomplices arrested at a later date.
This was a horrific murder. The only saving grace? Lauren says Charlie Kirk died in a matter of seconds as his internal tissues were shredded. So he did not have to suffer a long and painful death. Here’s more from Stephen Gardner.
With each passing day, it’s become more clear that the Kirk assassination was no “lone gun” event but rather a coordinated team effort, quite possibly involving the intelligence agencies. While there are certainly many smaller agencies that could be calling the shots, the focus has been on one of the biggest and dirtiest agencies of them all — the CIA.
Here, Redacted News interviews a variety of former CIA officials, as well as whistleblowers and others with extensive intelligence experience, who explain why the Kirk assassination bears all the attributes of the CIA’s handiwork. Roxan Watkins, a retired Air Force Officer who worked at the Pentagon as well as US Central Command, notes, “One principle I study is the ‘strategy of tension.’ Its goal is to keep populations divided, to prevent people from discovering commonalities, because unified populations are harder to control.”
She says the CIA has long focused on controlling university systems. Initially, that meant Harvard, Yale and Columbia, but the schools in Utah have attracted a lot of CIA interaction in recent years. “Utah is a great recruiting ground because of the skill sets students develop, such as language skills from Mormon missions.” In point of fact, Mormons account for about 2 percent of the U.S. population but between 5 and 20 percent of the employee bases within the CIA, as well as the FBI and Defense Intelligence Agency.
Watkins doesn’t necessarily believe the CIA, as an agency, orchestrated the killing, either. This could be a matter of rogue officers, she said, “They thrive on division. Moving toward a digital ID system and biometric tracking ensures total monitoring and control.”
Stephen Gardner and RET. Col Daniel Davis go deep into the Charlie Kirk investigation gaps. The FBI is holding back lots of video, photos, cell phone data, forensic analysis, ballistic report, autopsy report and more. Are they safeguarding evidence for the trial of Tyler Robinson, or just stonewalling and lying, as the agency has done repeatedly over the year.
The biggest gap is the gun. It’s highly likely the bullet fired did not come from a .30 06 Mauser rifle or it would have blown a huge hole out of the side of Kirk’s neck. Questions remain as well about the shooter, the firing location and the diversions in the aftermath of the blast. Here’s more from Daniel Davis’ show Deep Dive.
Following Charlie Kirk’s assassination, there have been more than 75,000 requests for new Turning Point USA chapters and many conservative commentators have written about his legacy and achievements. But what hasn’t been remarked about enough is, “What was the essence of his appeal to young voters?” asks Victor Davis Hanson on today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.”
The answer? Charlie Kirk understood that young people, by their very nature, are rebellious. He wanted to take their natural skepticism and point it toward the establishment, which, today, is composed of the corporate media, higher ed, and baby boomers who never got over the 1960s and ’70s.
“So what was the secret to his success? I think what he did was quite brilliant. He understood that young people are, by nature, rebellious. They always, as—you’re full of energy. They’re full of hormones. They’re full of ideas. They haven’t lived a long time. And they question authority. That’s innate to all of us at that age,” says Hanson.
Why do the Democrats and Republicans both seem to want to put a lid on the release of genuine information on Jeffrey Epstein? How many of the big politicians have been blackmailed? How many have been trapped in Epstein’s sexual entanglements?
Most of all, whose money was Epstein laundering? Was it CIA money or funds stolen from the American taxpayers through the Department of Defense or other federal agencies? Are we talking several billion dollars, or even trillions of dollars?
And who got the stolen funds? Were they going to Israel? To Mossad? Or to Mars?
Here, Catherine Austin Fitts talks about the money laundering angle with Stephen Gardner. The clip has been revived by Jimmy Dore and Kurt Metzger, who react on “The Jimmy Dore Show.”
Ever notice how the fake news and the Democrats in the U.S. Congress always follow the same script? Well, they apparently are all given the same talking points, and then they just regurgitate those talking points, like lemmings.
Here, Jimmy Dore from The Jimmy Dore Show undergoes how this “chaos” works, using short clips compiled by the Western Lensman. That’s a publication that originated in the small Colorado mining town of Ouray, but now has evolved into a much broader journal, “framing the spirit of the American West.”
For this segment, Dore is joined by journalist Stephen Gardner.
Cheating goes hand in glove for the Democrats. They have been fabricating votes and manipulating elections for more than 50 years.
Now, they are harnessing new technologies to transform the presidential debates into a charade. Here, Stephen Gardner cites evidence from an ABC whistleblower on how they cheated at the Philadelphia debate. It’s an ugly picture, but nothing new for these vile leftists.
