Look for military tribunals ahead as the Trump administration seeks charges against those who have committed treason, sedition, vote interference and other crimes against America. Juan O’Savin says military tribunals will not only be the best place to try these crimes, but likely one of the only venues where proper justice can be administered.
Initially, the Trump administration was looking to impanel grand juries in red states. It was presumed those jurors would be more inclined to seek justice, as opposed to the laissez-faire approach more likely if the jurors came from blue states and regions, such as New York or Washington D.C.
But the fact is: Treason and sedition are extremely complex and complicated crimes, as are election interference involving rigged vote processes with manipulation occurring in multiple locales abroad. Not only might Communist China be involved, but also Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, Serbia and other nations, as well as several foreign intelligence agencies.
With this degree of complexity, and given threats of intimidation, a military tribunal makes more sense. Here, Juan O’Savin discusses these and related issues with Michael Jaco.
Posted in
Political, Hey! and tagged
blue states,
Communist China,
Cuba,
Director of National Intelligence,
election interference,
foreign intelligence agencies,
grand juries,
intimidation,
Iran,
Juan O'Savin,
Michael Jaco,
military tribunals,
red states,
sedition,
Serbia,
treason,
Tulsi Gabbard,
Venezuela |
